Lightroom Magazine

a new magazine of photojournalism for photojournalists, travel photographers and other layabouts


Last updated: 30 January, 2008

January 2008 edition

This magazine is written entirely by Jon Mitchell and is © Copyrighted content.

Vol 25, Issue 5,000,000
Google
 




You may now search the lightroom domain for information from past editions and info from the Lightroom Photos web site. Using this search box helps to keep the magazine going. This magazine is entirely funded by google advertising, so please use the search and download the software suite for improved, safer, web browsing.
Editorial

Web 3.0?

I always thought I was on top of things when it came to matters technical. Though these days, I am not so sure...

Having only recently had the time to figure out that Web 2.0 refers to social networking sites like MySpace.com and Facebook.com, you have to wonder what on Earth "Web 3.0" will bring us?

I have still yet to set up my Facebook and get socially-networky with potential clients. Though it seems doing so is beneificial for a photographer, as it is basically free PR and you may sell a print or two or get invited into space or something!

As pictures are digital and intrisically popular on the web, it seems we could be entering a new era where we actually get a bit more respect for what we do and not just from picture editors and researchers, but ordinary people.

Hence you can now probably be more famous with your Facebook profile than getting your snaps in National Geographic or the like!

Indeed, Facebook and similar social networking sites may even become more important than your web site in time.

So what is Web 3.0 likely to entail. Well, looking into my crystal ball, some things become apparent. Social networking is becoming a way of doing business, so freelancers will need to embrace it and use it to their advantage. These sites are likely to get more industry-specific too.

Video will continue to be hip and larger bandwidth - like France Telecoms "Super Broadband" mean people can view it easier.

Stills will hold their own though, in my opinion.

Voice-activated search engines (they will love that at TopFoto!) are on the horizon - so careful what you say near your computer, as Big Brother (the US National Security Agency) will be listening and probably your neighbours and everyone on MySpace too!

"Show me photos of trees" - may well become the way researchers and editors access or material. Lets hope they say "please license this image" alot!

Mobile handsets like the iPhone with larger screens probably mean more pics will be licensed, as some of the Net moves onto these handsets.

Keyboards may well start to be replaced by other technologies, as more efficient means like voice recognition become more standardized.

Search engines may also change a lot and key words may become old hat - at least typing them into a box. It will be interesting to see how photo archives respond to these changes or whether they keep Web 1.0 technology.

These all impact on the way photographers produce and distribute images to clients.

Though still, the US dominance of the Internet poses problems, especially if, like me, you have some sad people at the NSA who are not very fond of you.

So while Web 3.0 looks like it could be fun, the shadow of Internet despotism still looms large over our cyber-existance.









****
Hello readers,

Here is another thrilling installment of Lightroom Magazine...I have now moved to a sort of blog format for the magazine, which will be archived on a monthly or bi-monthly basis. This allows me to add interesting stories as they arise.

Voice-activated keywording?

30 Jan 2008

Digital pundits reckon that 2008 may spell the end of the keyboard for many.

With voice-recognition software now becoming much more soophisticated and practical, the keyboard's days may be numbered for many of us and perhaps it's friend the mouse too.

Which leads me to think if anyone is building this sort of technology into our editing software. Enetering keywords by speaking them would surely be more efficient and less tiresome than typing them and could help to do it better, as say "cow" and "bovine, cattle, etc" are entered automatically would make image editing a lot easier.

Of course, you may need to lock your assistant in a cupboard - as it may be maddening to sit next to someone in an office while they mumble keywords all day! Though it certainly would speed up production of stock photos.

How stable is digital media?

30 Jan 2008

As we all mostly now have a digital archive of some description - be it film scans or digital files - the question of how to store it becomes of primary importance.

While super-duper gold-plated DVD and CD discs claim to hold data for centuries, there is not much evidence to back up this claim.

Here in Nepal, keeping data stable is a problem, a hot, sweaty humid Monsoon season rots anything not protected and so it is a good case in point.

Recently, trying to access some TIFF files on some DVDs burnt less than a year ago, several files were corrupt and could not be accessed. No great shakes, as I was then backing up as Comp 12 JPEG though a bit worrying.

Basically, archival digital media specialists reckon that data is inherently unstable, so it makes sense to "migrate" your data onto newer methods or even backup on a hard drive and store on DVD or whatever emerges as it's replacement. Especially if you are based somewhere that gold-plated archival DVD media is hard to come by - like Nepal.

It is also not a bad idea to send copies off to a different address from your office, there are many companies who store data in safe areas for a small fee per disc or drive.

Doing this on a monthly basis is not a bad idea, as if your house burns down, you will not loose your original data. Many of us of course, do backup automatically by sending files to photo libraries.


Nikon Announce D60 DSLR

30 Jan 2008

Imagine the sound of trumpets at a product launch and then them fading, off-key.Nikon D60

This would have been apt for the launch of the new, much-rumoured Nikon D60. It looks much like it's predecessor, the D40x and guess what? Also has a 10.2MP chip.

It sells for around the same price, though there are two subtle, but important differences between the D40x and the new D60.

This is - horrah! - a dust-off facility, combined with a method of keeping dust off the CCD in the first place. Better late than never, as they say...

Secondly, while the camera looks identical on the outside, it appears there is another change on the inside which is EXPEED image processing. Difficult to say from the Net reviews so far, though it is likely that this may solve the high-noise issues which are a problem with the D40x at higher ISO settings.

For those without lenses, the kit includes a reasonably-priced VR (Vibration Reduction) 18-55mm lens.

Many may be surprised that the new D60 lacks a 12MP chip, though this is surely to turn up on the D80x. It appears that Nikon are simply confirming the identity of their new low-end DSLR, by adding some useful features to separate it in consumers minds from the still-in-production 6MP D40.

Nikon also always been slower to up the size of sensors compared to other manufacturers, as was the case with the Nikon D70s - which retained it's predecessor's 6MP chip.

For professionals, the sensor size is less important these days as RAW processing software can knock out beautiful 6000 pixel plus images. Still, it would be nice to use the original res and this is more or less 16MP.

So while the D60 is not much to write home about, it does at least include some improved features on the D40x at no extra price.

Interesting though, what Nikon will bring out next in the DSLR market - my tip being a much improved D80, probably called a D80x with a 12.4MP chip and a few more bells and whistles. Though we will probably have to wait until the spring to find out. This will help them compete with the new Canon 450D, which has a 12.4MP chip.

Also interesting to see how their RAW development pans out, some other manufacturers are already adopting Adobe DNG (a standardized version of the RAW file from Adobe - to make it more like JPEG) as their RAW format. Nikon appear to be going the other way and forcing less choice of RAW processing, which may be a costly gamble with the consumer.


Robert Capa's Spanish Civil War treasure trove

28 Jan 2008

There are not many photographers who also make it into a book of quotations, though Robert Capa (alias Andre Freidman) managed just that.

"This war is like an actress who is getting old...It is less and less photogenic and more and more dangerous," he said of World War II.

Though of course, Capa is more famous for his pictures and last Sunday, several newspapers reported that around 127 rolls of previously missing film had finally turned-up at the International Centre of Photography in New York, which is run by the late photographer's brother Cornell Capa.

Robert Capa

Above: Robert Capa billed in Picture Post in December 1938 as "The Greatest War Photographer in the World" photographed by his girlfriend Gerda Taro during the Sanish Civil War, crica 1936, who died in Spain one year before.

Thus, the legend of Robert Capa continues, perhaps he is the most postumously famous photojournalist ever. The pictures were left in Paris when he left in 1939, fleeing the Nazis.

Indeed, the times were very much part of Capa's life, working for a press agency in 1930s Germany, as a Hungarian Jew, he soon realised he had to flee. He sold some of the agency's cameras, though left the pawn shop tickets!

He had left Hungary on the advice of his parents in 1932, due to his political sympathies with anti-government protestors - which led to his arrest. He soon figured out that Nazi Germany was perhaps more dangerous and left for Paris in 1933.

In 1936, he headed south to cover the Spanish Civil War and remained until 1939. In that same year, he took the legendary picture of a Republican (actually Loyalists, to the Spanish Republican government of the day) soldier at the moment of death.

It is these films which have now reappeared at the ICP. The "Mexican suitcase" as it has been called was aquired mysteriously by a Mexican diplomat, General Francisco Javier Aguilar Gonzalez (a soldier and diplomat for Pancho Villa) who was posted to Paris at the time. The films were then kept in his home until they were passed on to his children. Why the Mexican general kept the films hidden is a mystery.

In 1995, a professor at Queen's College in New York, a certain Jerald Green, recieved a letter from a Mexican film-maker who had inherited the suitcase witht he negatives and indentified them as the work of Robert Capa. He remains anonymous, though presumably is a relative of the general who aquired the films. The lost films were reported to have been finally sent to Cornell Capa after years of negotiations and eventually ended up at the ICP in December 2007.

Up to his unfortunate death in Vietnam in 1954, Robert Capa thought that the pictures were lost, which in a sense, they were.

Carefully rolled up and placed in cake boxes, the negatives are marked with brief caption information and according to the Kodak technicians, are in remarkably good condition.

There are some 3,500 or so pictures in total and what makes this appearance interesting is that the only pictures we have seen from this collection are largely the ones sent out as picture stories to magazines and newspapers such as Illustrated, Picture Post, Vu, Ce Soir and LIFE.

Picture Post - This is War!

Above: Capa's stunning picture essay from the Spanish Civil War was one of the first reportages which showed the reality of conflict. Published in the British magazine Picture Post - edited by the also legendary Stefan Lorant - on the 3rd December, 1938

The films also include some work by Capa's 1930s girlfriend Gerda Taro and David "Chim" Seymour.

"The full story of how the negatives made their way to Mexico might never be known but Capa apparently asked his darkroom manager, a Hungarian photographer named Imre Weisz, to save his negatives in 1939 or 1940, when Capa was in New York and feared his work would be destroyed," Brian Wallis, the chief curator of the ICP told the London Guardian.

It may have been the case that Mr Weisz could have handed them to the Mexican diplomat for safe-keeping, though it is odd that he never handed them over to the ICP or the agency that Capa helped to found, Magnum Photos.

While Capa was one of the first celebrity photojournalists - there are few these days - he also suffered a lot. His girfriend, Gerda Taro tragically was killed in a traffic accident in the Spanish Civil War in July 1937 as she covered the battle of Brunete.

He also suffered great bouts of poverty throughout his life (no change there then!) and was forever in financial difficulties between great bursts of success. When he arrived in New York, he became very poor and was only saved by a letter from LIFE Magazine which popped through his door in 1940 with news that he was to become one of their WW2 correspondents.

Many times though, he was forced to avoid the landlady at a guesthouse and sell equipment to eat. Often he says in his biography "Slightly Out of Focus" that he would spend all-day in bed to avoid working up any sensation of hunger and to save money!

Sadly, this appears to have also set a trend - aside from his innovative use of a 35mm Contax cameras, when most press photographers used 5x4 Speed Graphics.

Though through his coverage of the Second World War, when picture magazines were the CNN of their day, Capa's fame continued to grow. Actually, he arrived in the European Theatre quite late, though did noteable reportages from Italy in 1943 and later covered the Allied Invasion of Normandy in 1944.

He then followed the Allied troops all the way to Berlin and claimed to have taken a picture of the "last German soldier killed" - though this was probably dramatic license.

Controversy surrounds his famous picture of the falling Republican soldier, though this is probably incorrect and it is doubtful the picture was staged.

Falling Republican Soldier, Robert Capa

Above: A spread from a French news magazine (probably Vu) showing one of his most famous pictures - that of a Republican soldier at the moment of being shot in the Spanish Civil War (top left)

Infamously, the darkroom technician at LIFE Magazine's office in London - a 15 year-old called Dennis Banks - left them in the dryer too long and melted most of the emulsion from the 106 frames - leaving only a handful - just eight surviving.

However, what was left were hailed as some of the best pictures from D-Day and the slightly melted emulsion gives them a more gritty counternance.

Following the Allied invasion he also photographed the liberation of Paris and also Leipzig.

After the war ended, in 1947, along with David Seymour, Henri Cartier-Bresson and George Rodger (all also legendary in their own right) established Magnum Photos.

This agency had it's ups and downs in the first few years and Capa famously took all the profits one day from the bank and gambled them on a horse - which won and saved the agency.

His death came during the lesser-known French conflict in Vietnam - before the Americans were involved. This was out covering South Vietnamese troops as they patrolled a paddy field which was mined. Capa ran ahead to photograph them and stepped on one and died.

His legacy is massive though and his contribution to photojournalism is undeniable. The quick candid snapshot style influences war photographers to this very day and indeed many film-makers. While not regarded as a great photographer in terms of composition, he certainly had the content and his photographs also show many touching, human moments of war, in all it's sadness and granduer.

Also, his character was special. One friend said of him; "Capa speaks several languages, all of them badly..." and there is another well-known quote from William Saroyan who said; "Capa is a poker player whose sideline in picture-taking." Capa also often played poker with the editors of magazines (good old days for sure, try to find a picture editor who still goes to the pub, never mind gambles on the politically-correct desks of today!).

For Capa life was a gamble, and he often bet and won. Though one wonders if he bet that his missing Paris films would turn up 70 years later and find their way into the hands of his brother?

A treasure of photojournalism it surely is and photojournalism lovers world-wide will surely wait with baited breath to see this new aspect of Capa's work which has now come to light.


Canon announce 450D, Nikon rumoured to be launching D60

Canon 450D / Kiss / Rebel XSi
28 Jan 2008

Predictably, now we are in the time of the PMA show, the new DSLRs from the major players are being launched. Canon were quick to launch the expected 450D (or Rebel/Kiss XSi - pictured right) with a 12MP chip and yes, someone there has finally replaced that battery from hell - the NB-2LH - with something that lasts a lot longer.

Rumours have been flying about over Nikon's D40x replacement, which allegedly is the D60. It was also rumoured that a D80x or a D90 was on the horizon, though Internet rumours seem to be settling on the D60 as the new Nikon offering. The confidence in this rumour is the same source was bang on the money regarding the recent launch of the Nikon D3 and D300.

It seems both manufacturers are now starting to understand the complicated "entry-level" DSLR market. I call it also the "cheap and serious" market and it is becoming apparent that the better the camera, the better it sells in this sector, which spans curious amateurs to seasoned pros with no cash like yours truly.

I used a D40x and was fairly impressed with it and I should be for the money it costs. Building in daft design obstructions to try and squeeze cash out of those who do not have it, simply does not make commercial sense and it is good that people at Canon at least are starting to understand this.

Sure, some pros can afford a Canon 5D or a Nikon D3, though most of us photojournalists are poor and work in dodgy areas where cameras get damaged (usually in bars after too many beers!-), so it makes sense to shoot with lower-priced DSLRs which are easily replaced. During the 2006 anti-monarchy protests in Kathmandu, Nepal, I was surprised to see a photographer from Polaris Images using a pair of Nikon D50s, though it makes sense, as most photojournalists used two camera bodies before the advent of the digital era.

A quick review of the new Canon 450D reveals a far better and more useful camera than the 350D or th 400D. Two of these makes a nice press photography outfit and the new battery is nearly as good as the one on the 40D.

My first DSLR was in fact a 350D and I liked it, though soon dumped it as the battery simply would not stand professional use, conking out within three hours!

Hence I switched to the Olympus E-510, though that was thankfully stolen a few days later - the chip is very poor quality, so in fact the thieves did me a favour!

I then bought a D40x last year and have been very happy with the camera and the quality of the images upto 800 ISO (above that it is a very noisy business and needs noise removal at the editing stage).

At the time of writing, it seems that Nikon are3 biding their time on the alleged new D60. They may be looking for the reaction the new Canon 450D gets before making last minute adjustments and putting the new camera out on the market.

Strangely enough, the 6MP Nikon D40 is still in production, while the D40x production has been closed down. There still of course, may be a replacement for the now middle-aged (in digi camera terms) D80, which is probably the D80x. So you will need to watch this space (and others) for more info. Lightroom Magazine will of course, report these new models in due course.

On this subject, worth looking at is the new Pentax 20D and it's Samsung doppleganger. These new manufacturers have to work a little harder than more established brands like Nikon and Canon and may churn out some good cameras. The new Pentax has one advantage, a 14MP chip. You can decide for yourself, by looking at my favorite digi camera review sit DP Review - http://www.dpreview.com/ .


Nikon to keep RAW code secret, to lock out third party software developers!

Jan 2008

Reports from some web sites say that Nikon are due to make their RAW file coding secret - to lock out third party RAW software developers.

If my experience of their Nikon Capture 1.2 is anything to go by, then my advice is not to buy their cameras and learn black magic as to put awful spells on Nikon's board of directors!

Meanwhile, the RAW debacle continues, though Pentax's K100 does shoot Adobe DNG RAW files, which is a standard of sorts.

Nikon's decision really shows what a bunch of money-obsessed loons they are as I tried to buy a copy of Capture 1.2 and guess what? The serial number did not work!

On top of that, on the Mac, their cache does not empty properly and it takes too long to process a RAW file on a reasonably powerful laptop (G4 Mac) - almost 10 mins per pic. Other software supplied with the Nikon D40x I bought simply did not work.

To be fair, I was actually pleased with the file quality knocked out by Capture 1.2, though not so pleased with it's memory problems (you need to restart your machine after about six pictures!) and the generally poor service from the company - who it is clear are only interested in your cash.

Their customer support is pants in the extreme, so this is possibly the end of pros using their equipment.

I have now sold the D40x, which is not a bad camera in many respects, though lack of dust removal is a problem and Nikon's ED lenses don't seem to correct chromatic distortion too well. Nikon said recently that they did not put dust removal on the camera because "the type of customer who would use this camera does not change lenses very often"! Then why make it a DSLR and not a fixed lens camera? The mind does boggle, especially at Nikon these days, it seems where logic has obviously taken a long hike.

I am now seriously thinking of selling my Nikon lenses and buying from another manufacturer, as I am not very happy with the software or the general quality of the product (though still, the CCD is pretty good, unlike the Olympus DSLR I bought, which was crap).

Sad that the big camera companies are such a bunch of corporate idiots.


Alamy excell themselves in foolishness once again

I had a big argument with Alamy Images a few years ago, due to their "Head of Content" (shithead?), one Alan Capel deleting all my files under 24MB, because "that is what is in the contract"!

Which is fine if they did it across the board, though a quick search on that lovely chap "Brian Harris" immediately revealed that I was the only one where the contract was so strictly enforced!

I did complain to BAPLA, though was met with a load of crap from that wonderful organisation, who found Alamy had not played unfairly!

In December, I signed up again due to poverty (50 pence / image / year from TopFoto) and now I have tons of files over 24MB, so what the hell? Hell, it actually turned out to be...This time from a faceless official who said my four "intitial quality control submission" pics were rejected  - on made up grounds - due to "dust and artefacts" (I think this person used to help out in Tony Blair's press office) and "fuzziness" (Digital ICE on a 5000dpi Nikon scan of 200 ISO film!) and a few other silly excuses.

So, I complain to James West the CEO of Alamy and get a load of rubbish from him via email basically saying that he is not going to lift a finger! Hence, no pics on alamy, because it is unlikely I will get anything through the fools that work in their so-called "quality control" department. Where is obvious that they do not know their elbow from their postierors.


And more on dodgy agencies...

My recent adventures in Microstock have not yeilded any money so far, though have been revealing in the extreme.

Thanks to all my chums in the US and UK intel agencies who seem hell-bent on destroying what little career I have left, even the Micro RF portals started messing me about, especially ones in the "land of the free" (hahahaha) - the USA.

Stockxpert, bigstockphoto.com, fotolia.com...the list goes on. ALL of them either refused to set up my account or refused my images on very spurious grounds. It seems most of these RF Microstock portals employ monkeys - no that is an insult to monkeys  total arses is perhaps a better term - to edit incoming material.

"Too much noise" on a Canon S70 pic shot on 200 ISO. "Poor composition" on a classic rule of thirds. Need I go on? No is the answer. These portals are mostly run by complete idiots, so don't say you have not been warned...


More adventures in Microstock RF - what I have learned

Bascially, Microcrap sites are fun and there is real money there for the right type of picture, one on istockphoto.com had 7,500 downloads and not all at US$1, some of these sites sell high res at upto $20 each.

The picture was of a ordinary suburban American home. No surprise the number of downloads when you consider the number of real estate agents in the US.

Aside from the asnine editing by people who seem to know zero about picture editing, these sites - while mostly shady - can be a good option for some parts of your collection, mostly the fluff. But if fluff makes cash, then why not?

Getting a large number of files on these sites - enough to make any cash - is difficult due to the fools who do the editing. In my opinion, you can earn as much-ish as your RM collection from the right sites and the right images.

You can also shoot especially for this market and one boon is they are easily pleased, these sites take virtually anything that fits their specialist criteria - which is mostly standard RF stuff - no recognizable faces without model releases, no logos and no recognizable buidlings. Anything else is fair game, if you can get it past the moron who edits the incoming picture queue!

And this is a recurring theme with these sites. The problem is time. When you add it up, all that uploading and rejecting add up to a lot of wasted hours editing and uploading stuff that ends up being rejected - often for stupid reasons. As most of us have horrible edit queues with thousands of unedited pics, the question arises - should you bother?

I do wonder about this, though perhaps a well-thought out collection of stuff is worth uploading to an RF Micro site you sort of get along with. All have frustrating editors and you can't argue with them. You are welcome to burn effigies of them though or perhaps throw darts at their image.

Personally, I have told quite a few of them to literally "f**k off" - as they were simply some of the worst morons I have ever dealt with - amid stiff competition in the world of photojournalism and journalism.

Though if you can set a bored spouse to work on it or have skin a foot thick, then perhaps you can find some way of having a professional relationship with these sites and it may well be a lucrative one if you have the right material.

Microcrap clients are generally people who would not go to your Rights Managed agency or even a high-priced RF agency. These are generally small businesses with tiny budgets for promotional material and people with web sites which earn a pittance on google adsense (did somebody mention Lightroom Magazine?). Hence, the economics of it are that you get a good snap of a plant in your garden or just a trendy garden and hey presto, out of the web woodwork come a ton of John Smith's who need your image and have a few quid to buy it. Result, a few hundred bucks from an OK pic.

Microcrap in reality is not so crap, there are some rubbish pics on these sites, though I can say that about many RM portals (did someone mention Alamy?). There are lots of great pics on these sites though and lots of creative illustrations. Certainly, whether you like it or not, Micro RF is here to stay and has a solid, non-traditional client base.

It also appears the main victim of these sites is high quality RF sites, rather than Rights Managed stock agencies. Why pay $500 for an RF license when you can pay 100th of that? i can't seem to find a logical answer aside from perhaps larger file sizes and slightly better quality.

Also, with recession looming in many parts of the world, these sites save businesses money, which with small to medium size enterprises is important, hence, they may attract even more clients in the future, some who would usually part with more for good photos.

I very much doubt it will impact much on the editorial stock photo market (which is mostly Rights Managed) and RM pics still earn more on average than even high-priced RF. The reason? You can't get most RM-type pics on these sites for legal reasons.

So much of the rubbish gibbered by various idiots in this industry regarding RF Microstock is simply wrong. Poor analysis of this side of the stock photo business is not really helpful to photographers and even the BBC's Click! (a TV show about Net affairs) did a pretty poor job of reporting the exact nature of this industry.

As for those who spend a fortune on shoots, it seems that they need to adapt. The high end RF market may be affected, though still, some larger companies will not want a non-exclusive image and prefer something less used, hence for ABC Real Estate (imaginary company), with several thousand offices in the US, etc, the istockphoto 7,500 download pic is simply not an option. They will pay more for an exclusive-ish image, which could well be high-end RF at $500 a download.

In the middle of it all is Bill Gate's offering to RF "mid-stock" - snapvillage.com - this is a nice web site and has semi-professional people editing the incoming pics. So their editing decisions are at least understandable. You can set the price from US$1-50 for any use, regardless of file size.

The only problem with snapvillage.com is that it is run by Microsoft, hence the upload does not work most of the time, though you can send them a DVD. You can also opt for "subscription downloads" - though these are generally a rip-off for the photographer.

One other interesting thing with these sites is they record the number of views of each image, giving you a vague idea as to the popularity of each pic. This helps to hone shooting pics for this market and would be a welcome feature on RM sites too.

It will be interesting to see if high-end RF prices hold out much longer, as the Micro sites get more and more and more content of sometimes a high creative nature.

Also interesting to see who stays in business over the next few years, while there is something of a gold rush on in this end of the market, it is obvious that some are fools and no one ever managed to get rich from fool's gold...


RAW Developer rocks!

After my less-than-pleasant experience with Nikon Capture 1.2, off I went to cyberland and tried to find a program to process my Nikon RAW NEF files, as the manufacturer of the camera so kindly does not supply software to process these pics - or any which works on a PC or Mac (I tried both).

First I found Rawker, which is a pretty good, though achingly slow (on 512MB 1Ghz G4 Mac Powerbook) at making a TIFF. Rawker is freeware though and not a bad backup program or not bad if you have a very powerful new computer.

Better though, is RAW Developer, better than PhotoMechanic and Bibble (which I both thought are the most overated bits of software since Windows XP!).

RAW Developer is also one of the cheapest at $100 or so. Unfortunately, I can't afford even that and think it should be $25 or less - like all software (funny how games never cost much more than $50 and are more complex, though some photo app is always expensive!).

The great thing about this program is speed. It whistles through 10MP RAW files, seemlessly converting them into 100MB TIFF files. It's user interface is easy to use and that makes workflow relatively simple. The curve corrections are great and you often do not need to alter them in post-production software like Photoshop CS2. It's interpolation is also very high quality, just a little better than Photoshop bi-cubic smoother (which is also a good way to enlarge your images and does the same job as expensive and slow software like Genuine Fractals).

RAW Developer also reads 4GB of RAW data quite quickly - in under 5 mins. You then horozontally scroll through your pics, choose the one you want to edit and it quickly appears on the screen.

One other useful tool is a built-in noise reducer, which works quite well with the noisy-as photos I took with the D40x on 1600 ISO or 3200 ISO. Some other programs may do it better, though I was quite impressed by it's result with some very noisy low-light pictures I took in recent months.

All in all, a good option for the serious digital photographer.


PNG format

While sitting with a self-confessed computer geek some weeks ago, I stumbled upon the knowledge of the PNG format, which is a slightly better method of compression than JPEG.

JPEG is somewhat ancient technology, though so ubiquitous as to keep a certain position in the world of computing and gagetry.

While JPEG will be a standard for some time to come - especially when you look at the utter chaos surrounding a common RAW format - PNG is worth a serious look.

Why? Well, the short answer is workflow. PNG allows easy access to your RAW files and it is not too hard to find an image browser that will do this. iView Media Pro does it quite well, for example, and probably so does many other image browsers.

PNG is also good for backing up your precious digital files, though actually uses slightly more space than the original RAW, though much less than a TIFF file.

The PNG format is easily edited by a variety of photo-editing software, including Photoshop and probably GIMP (if not, someone will probably write a patch for it soon).

It can then be converted to a TIFF and then a JPEG for distribution. There is very little loss of data in a PNG and it is easy to convert your images without specialist RAW software.

Dedicated RAW software is generally a better option if you can afford it, though can be problematic, for instance, CS2 will not read some RAW files from newer cameras, you need CS3, etc, etc.

Hence, PNG solves the problem of how to get your RAW into the editing software and off to your clients or photo agency.

Well, that's it for this installment of Lightroom Magazine, hope you enjoyed the stories or even found them useful and check back in a few months when I have the time to issue another exciting edition of Lightroom Magazine!








Lightroom Magazine Archive

February / March 2007 - Issue 1

April / May 2007 - Issue 2

June / July 2007 - Issue 2 & 3 (well for £7.50 from google adsense - what do you expect!)

August 2007 - Issue 4




Lightroom Magazine is published and edited by Jonathan Mitchell  © 2008 All rights reserved.